tpo 27
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the main factors which led to the Little Ice Age. While the reading part lists some factors as the possible reasons for this incident, the professor counters these specific points. Based on the instructor's evidence, these factors are assumed to be accountable of this phenomenon for the sake of the out of date information; but, current information challenges the accuracy of these factors.
First of all, the article mentions to the disrupting of ocean currents as the feasible cause of this event; on the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on the validity of this claim. As he asserts the cooling effect of Gulf Stream could be responsible for the cold weather in the Europe and America. However, the weather of southern hemisphere was cold too, which the Gulf Stream could not lead to it. Thus, this factor does not support this evident cogently.
Next, meanwhile, the text posits that the dark cloud released by the volcanic eruption could be the reason of this incident, the professor refutes this claim. As he states although the dark cloud can lead to the cold weather, it should be sufficient and strong enough to cause this action. Besides, the dark cloud has visual effects. For instance, it leads to the colorful sunset or the grey snowfall. Since there is no any report of these visual alterations on that period, the dark cloud was not strong enough to lead this event.
Finally, the passage assumes that the decrement of people populations could impact it indirectly, inasmuch as based on this decline the forests were expanded and the volume of greenhouse gas was decreased. On the contrary, based on the professor assertion, the decrement of populations moved back to its previous position in a very short span; in addition, they started to cut down the trees just like past time. As a result, there was no time for the expansion of the forests and the decrement of the greenhouse gas.
- tpo28 70
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 60
- A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. At present, the nearest jazz club is over 60 miles away from Monroe; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. In addition, there is ample evi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...et or the grey snowfall. Since there is no any report of these visual alterations ...
^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...started to cut down the trees just like past time. As a result, there was no time for the...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252688172043 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.115591397849 0.158904122519 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0806451612903 0.0723426182421 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0430107526882 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0215053763441 0.0277247811725 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126344086022 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0268817204301 0.0370669169778 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51460935279 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268817204301 0.0208969081088 129% => OK
Particles: 0.00268817204301 0.00154638098197 174% => OK
Determiners: 0.177419354839 0.128158765124 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161290322581 0.0158828679856 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00537634408602 0.0114777025283 47% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1963.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 333.0 271.125827815 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89489489489 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342342342342 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264264264264 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189189189189 0.187439937562 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105105105105 0.113142543107 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51460935279 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537537537538 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.1991219032 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.757726208 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.866666667 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 48.6264264264 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.25373134328 1.90840788429 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.602078197672 0.549887131256 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157895836043 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.086028789577 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.64183211963 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152710313823 0.139662658121 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299616491634 0.266732575781 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114531819497 0.103435571967 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.532443139399 0.414875509568 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0327902426873 0.0530846634433 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.462723461895 0.40443939384 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318018093646 0.0528353158467 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.