TPO 30 integrated essay
The reading and the lecture are both about the "burning mirror". The auther says when the Roman navy attacked the greeks, they defended themselves with a particular weapon called " burning mirror", which was ingenious but the auther thinks that it doesn't true. The lecturer challenged this claim. she states they built that practical weapon.
First of all, the auther believes that the greeks weren't technologicall to can reach this achievement. The article mentions that it had to be wild as enough as it can set ships on fire. Moreover, it had to have parabolic curvature. The lecturer argues with this hypothesis. she points out that they knew what are its properties to make this device.
Secondly, the article states that it takes long time to set fires on fire. The lecturer ignores the claim made by the auther. she adds the weapon didn't include woods alone. they also had a special material between woods called pich which could set on fire in second and that makes the weapon setting on fire quickly enough.
Third, the writer thinks that the burning mirror wasen't an improvement on weapon because the greeks had a way which was useful like a burning mirror,therefore, the greeks didn't have any reason to make it. The lecturer opposits it. she says it was more effective that other ways because when they used it, enemy couldn't see raising the mirror they can just see the mirror that's why it's much more effective.
'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ingenious but the auther thinks that it doesnt true. The lecturer challenged this clai...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the auther thinks that it doesnt true. The lecturer challenged this claim. she sta...
^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ue. The lecturer challenged this claim. she states they built that practical weapon...
^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ll, the auther believes that the greeks werent technologicall to can reach this achiev...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...e lecturer argues with this hypothesis. she points out that they knew what are its ...
^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...r ignores the claim made by the auther. she adds the weapon didnt include woods alo...
^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...made by the auther. she adds the weapon didnt include woods alone. they also had a sp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...s the weapon didnt include woods alone. they also had a special material between woo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , therefore
...y which was useful like a burning mirror,therefore, the greeks didnt have any reason to ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... a burning mirror,therefore, the greeks didnt have any reason to make it. The lecture...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...r ways because when they used it, enemy couldnt see raising the mirror they can just se...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...the mirror they can just see the mirror thats why its much more effective. .
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or thats why its much more effective. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93469387755 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52513637298 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.7191075694 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5625 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324956031415 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945349202853 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905436431261 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185348918528 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041015676719 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.