The reading and lecture both discuss quackers sounds that are detected in north alantic and arctic ocean. While the reading stats that source of quackers are move so speed and agility so sonar unable to detect the source of sound and provides three theories to find the cause of add sounds. However, the professor say that quackers source unknown and this theories are problematic.
First of all, the reading claims quackers are created by ocra male and female whales during courtship ritual. The reading also say that whales are make such kind of sound to attract male whales. However, the professor refutes this point by stating orca whales are live in upper water surface and submarines are travel deep water, so submarine are not heard the sound made by whales.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that giant squids was create that quackers sound. The reading also says that their soft bodies have no skeleton so they are not detected and their complex brain structure suggest they can make such sounds. The professor refutes this claims by pointing out that squid are long term residents on this area and quackers sound was first detected 1960 and it disappear 1980, but squids are still live there.
Finally, the reading passage argues that other country's submarines are create this sound when the patrolling this area. Other county used new technology to avoid detection and they create this sound unintentionally. The professor refutes this claims by pointing out that submarines are not move so first that not detected by sonar. New technology are not able to reduce sound when submarines run.
- TPO 42 76
- TPO 45-integrated 3
- TOEFL Sample essay : integrated essay from TPO 12 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 44 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unable to detect the source of sound and provides three theories to find the caus...
^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...or say that quackers source unknown and this theories are problematic. First of a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...akes the argument that giant squids was create that quackers sound. The reading also s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...ims by pointing out that squid are long term residents on this area and quackers sou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disappears'?
Suggestion: disappears
...rs sound was first detected 1960 and it disappear 1980, but squids are still live there. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...gues that other countrys submarines are create this sound when the patrolling this are...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut that submarines are not move so first that not detected by sonar. New technolo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, so, still, while, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02602230483 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25914668168 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486988847584 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7436527436 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359290669328 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143818802475 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435467620989 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230262607477 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349677607987 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.