tpo 36
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on advantages of "cloud seeding" technique to prevent of damage of hail for crops and farmlands. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses which are refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that scientific tests have been performed on cloud seeding method and its positive effect on reducing the damage of hail has been proofed. While, the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, the laboratory condition can not be relied and applay for real situation and silver iodide can hinder any percipitation such as rain, snow, etc. and may result drought. As a result, this point can not be considerable.
The second item offered by the writer is that some events from other part of world like Asia have shown the effectiveness of this method. However, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by say ing that the results of applying the above technique for urban area in Asia may be not similar to the unplouted areas and farming lands in US. The ploution has critical role in this method.
Lastly, the writer proposes local studies in US show that cloud seeding has reduced damages on farming lands in comparison to the past year. On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. She claims that diminishment of hail damages may be related to natural processing around that area and not be due to using cloud seeding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | HideAPumpkin | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | whiteflower | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Mizanur | 40 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | alibenvari | 70 | view |
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 3
- TPO37Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- tpo 10Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage. declining the population of sea otter in the western coast of North America from California to Alaska 83
- TPO 28 76
- TPO 7 Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.American wood companies ecologically standard 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erformed on cloud seeding method and its positive effect on reducing the damage o...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng the damage of hail has been proofed. While, the speaker views this issue from oppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain, snow, etc. and may result drought. As a result, this point can not be consi...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and not be due to using cloud seeding.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95416666667 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57131275919 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.8675404758 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4615384615 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.