TPO 36
Both of the provided materials are discussing Hail prevention for the good of farms using cloud seeding. The author believes this method is effective and names three sheds of evidence for it. The lecture, on the other hand, finds these peices of evidence rather not convincing, and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading refers to a labratory environment that the experiment of could seeding resulted in light snow rather than hail. However, the professor opposes this point by stating that in a real world environment, there exists a chance of extinguishing the percipitation over a arid region. In other words, if an area is already short in rain, addition of silver iodide in the coulds above it may cause a unexpected drought. Thus, the corps are still in danger but this time for the lack of water.
Second, the reading avers that the real world test of such a practice proved to be successful in Asia. Nonetheless, the lecturer contends that the asian researchers applied this method in a urban area. This can make a differnece from the situation in US since studies have shown urban areas pollutants can make a favorable condtion for silver iodide to take effects. Thus, we cannot be sure if cloud seeding can be as effective in a not polluted area.
Third, the author describes a local study regarding to this task, that is where cloud seeding reduced hail in a particular area. The lecture refutes this point by saying that all nearby areas of the test enviroment were short on hail during the experiment time as well. Thus, she concludes that this outcome is not a result of cloud seeding, but it is most likely to be related to a general climate change in that region of study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | HideAPumpkin | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | whiteflower | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Mizanur | 40 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | alibenvari | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Sometimes it is better to be dishonest.” Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- TPO 39 3
- TPO 12 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 76
- Being dishonest is ok sometimes 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'seed'
Suggestion: seed
...nvironment that the experiment of could seeding resulted in light snow rather than hail...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of extinguishing the percipitation over a arid region. In other words, if an area...
^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iodide in the coulds above it may cause a unexpected drought. Thus, the corps are...
^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sian researchers applied this method in a urban area. This can make a differnece ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, still, third, thus, well, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79461279461 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53327121933 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2247623548 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.