tpo 4
In the set of the reading and the lecture, the author and the professor both discuss dinosaurs. On the one hand, the reading argues that dinosaurs, which were the ancestors of modern reptiles, were varied from their contemporary generations and were endotherms by pointing out 3 reasons of supporting: polar dinosaurs, dinosaurs’ leg position and movement, and bones structure. On the other hand, the lecture opposes the author by stating that those evidences in the reading are not correct and dinosaurs were not endotherms.
First of all, the reading states that living in polar areas is a firm proof regarding this issue that dinosaurs were endotherms. Just creatures that can keep up a temperature well over that of the encompassing condition could be dynamic in such chilly atmospheres. However, the lecture disagrees by stating that the Polar Regions were significantly hotter than today so that dinosaurs could easily live there in part of the year. Furthermore, another viable reason is that dinosaurs could immigrate or hibernate in cold periods of the years. Therefore, being in pole would not be adequate proof that proves this feature in dinosaurs.
In addition, the reading goes on to state that the dinosaurs' leg placed underneath their body instead of at their body side, so they can run easily, unlike crocodiles and lizard. On the contrary, the professor refuses to accept writer’s idea by insisting that if their legs were located at the sides of the animal's body, they would not have been capable of supporting the huge weight of their body. Consequently, they actually needed such tools since they were growing in a large size. So dinosaurs' leg position was under their body, but it was not due to the running purposes nonetheless.
Last but not least, the reading indicates that the bone structure of the fossils, which were contained Haversian canals, as the last point for supporting the claims that dinosaurs were endotherms. In contrast, the professor contradicts the writer’s opinion by asserting that the dinosaurs did have the Haversian canals, but there are further indicators that revealed they did not have constant and regular growth. Indeed, in cooled periods they slow down or stop their growing trend, though endotherms animals have rapidly and contentiously growing trend.
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone Others like to be with friends most of the time Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends Use specific reasons to support your answer 74
- Some people like doing work by hand Others prefer using machines Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- Which would you choose a high paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends Explain your choice using specific reasons and 43
- In some countries people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule Use specific reasons and details to support your position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and dinosaurs were not endotherms. First of all, the reading states that li...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at proves this feature in dinosaurs. In addition, the reading goes on to stat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the running purposes nonetheless. Last but not least, the reading indicate...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 374.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24331550802 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77457279017 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9946029145 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.