The reading passage states that it is imposible to set up a permanent human station on Venus and provides three reasons in support.However, the professor's lecture believes that the ideas presented in the reading are not convincing since it is possible to perform a station near 50 kilometers of Venus' surface and provides three specific reasons to underscore his standpoint.
First, the reading claims that the magnitude of pressure on the Venus surface could shatter anythings such as spacecraft. Nonetheless, the professor rebuts this point. He says that in 50 kilometers of Venus' surface, the intensity of air pressure is as normal as the earth and nothing would be crushed by air pressure.
Second, the passage asserts that some essential sustenance such as oxygen and water are not available in the Venus. Nevertheless, the lecturer repudiates this idea by providing an innovative solution. Ideed, it is possible to extract water and oxygen through solphor diaxide and carbon dioxide existing in the Venus' atmosphere. Hence, the idea ensures the presence of enough sustenace through chemical interaction and help to avoid importing them from the earth.
Third, the reading mentions that the lack of sun light is another crucial problems which causes further problem like lack of electricity. By contrast, the professor rejects this point. He explains that in 50 kilometers of the Venus' surface, none of the thick cloud existed. Also, the reflected light of the cloud and the direct sunlight would help to increase the efficacy of solar power cells and produces much more electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...s and provides three reasons in support.However, the professors lecture believes that t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27450980392 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77785497778 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1652977297 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331970184622 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104229599801 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600729016564 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183242334094 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045730678287 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.