The reading and the writing both are about the human existence at the Venus planet and the author provides three reasons, why it is difficult for humans to survive at the Venus planet. The lecturer challenges the reasons made by the author. He is of the opinion that it is possible for the humans to live here.
First of all, the author suggests that atmospheric pressure at the venous plant is a very high as compared to the earth. the article notes that in this high atmospheric pressure, everything has crushed, even the aircraft which were sent over there, were finished. So, humans could not be survived in such atmosphere. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that if station would have built high in the atmosphere instead of the surface, after that, the atmosphere pressure will be equal to earth's atmospheric pressure and he also provides the example of balloon to illustrate the statement.
Secondly, the passage contends that there is hardly any traces of oxygen and water, so, living without oxygen and water is not possible for people. The speaker, however, refutes the statement by asserting that there is compounds of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and other gases. In that way, it is quite possible to make water and oxygen from those compounds. He elaborates on this that no need to import any chemicals as mentioned in the article that importing water at such place is impractical.
In the last, it is stated that very little sunlight reflects there and in the absence of sunlight it is tough to make electricity from solar plant and no equipment and machines have no life on the planet without electricity. Nonetheless, the speaker posits that clouds are fifty kilometers high is not very thick and solar plant could work because clouds reflects the sunlight and that energy can be used to generate electricity. Therefore, venous plant can become a human station.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 71
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 83
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s a very high as compared to the earth. the article notes that in this high atmosph...
^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had built'?
Suggestion: had built
...nd, the lecturer argues that if station would have built high in the atmosphere instead of the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are compounds'?
Suggestion: there are compounds
...refutes the statement by asserting that there is compounds of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and other g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92476489028 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54333806415 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510971786834 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5711220103 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347959407328 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986423750365 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532207062467 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175378470559 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191502100884 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.