In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments in the reading passage about silver coin found in Main cite.She states all the reasons that author presented is arguable and she refutes all of them. She says the silver coin is real and not a fake historical evidence.
First of all, a great distance between the cite and the place that coin was found can not eliminate the possibility of the fact that it is real. In fact there are other object in the same cite that originated from the same great distance which indicates ancient native American traveled these great distances to obtain object from that place and this reason is not true.
Also, the author states not finding another coin is in contrast of being real historical evidence.However the lecturer points out not necessarily it means it is fake. In fact Norse was not living there permenantly and he moved back and forth so he brought them from Europe and then when he returned he took back them to Europe.
Lastly, although the coin did not have the valu like Europe as money there,it had visual attraction and as visual object due to their beauty important for them. They could used them in necklaces.
- TPO 1, Integrated Writing 3
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- In this set of material the reading and the listening passages are discussing the Altruism, given explanation of this term and examples to support the main idea. Nevertheless, the reading and the listening passage are completely contradictory. In fact, wh 3
- Independent TOEFL essay - TPO 3: Agree or disagree: It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...ge about silver coin found in Main cite.She states all the reasons that author pres...
^^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'objects'?
Suggestion: objects
...hat it is real. In fact there are other object in the same cite that originated from t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...trast of being real historical evidence.However the lecturer points out not necessarily...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...trast of being real historical evidence.However the lecturer points out not necessarily...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...have the valu like Europe as money there,it had visual attraction and as visual obj...
^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and as visual object due to their beauty important for them. They could used them...
^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... beauty important for them. They could used them in necklaces.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, so, then, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67289719626 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36165838835 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7636630291 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27818417701 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119515448658 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531538836116 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150588867549 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239345873244 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.