TPO 45
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that some fossil structure resembled bees nests are discovered from 200 million years ago, but some skeptics say that this fossil not belong to bees and provide 3 reasons. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading indicates that fossil of bees could not remain from 200 million years ago, and the earliest bees' fossil discovered from 100 million years ago. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that it is true that no fossil remains of actual bees 200 years ago, but it does not mean bees could not exist on that time. Bees could not preserve fossil on that time because fossils have been preserved in the fossilized resin tree. And trees that produced resin were rare. So, the fossil cannot remain from bees.
Furthermore, the reading argues that 200 million years ago, the flowering plant did not exist, so bees did not have food and they could not live; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. She points out that early bees may feed on the non-flowering plant. They ate non-flowering plants such as ferns and pine tree. When flowering plant grew, bees adapted to eat them.
Finally, according to the reading, fossils are similar to nest chambers made by modern bees, and the fossils do not have spiral caps, so the fossils may be made by other insects. However, the professor believes that chemical evidence shows that chambers were made by bees. Because bee produced some especial chemical component such as waterproof. When fossils were chemically analysis, it shows that they have some kind of waterproof materials that made by bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...200 million years ago, and the earliest bees fossil discovered from 100 million year...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in contrast, kind of, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07586206897 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35517241379 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503448275862 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2412769012 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10009546317 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437862054593 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0187342986583 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679095627115 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00619109371714 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.