The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to why many animals were larger in the past and provides three reasons of support. Nonetheless, the professor explain that none of the evidence verified the factors that caused them to be enormous and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage mentions that a great deal of animal in large size due to amount of oxygen in the early earth were much more than today. In contrary, the professor provides the information that it was impossible. He states that in the early earth, there were numerous volcanic activity that produced poisonous chemical into air, which brought about the air being less inhaleable so as for animal to survive. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that, in the past indeed there was insufficient oxygen.
Second, the reading passage pushes forth the idea that abundant plant life provided scores of nutrients which led to bigger growth. Nevertheless, the professor explain that indeed a vast number of plant were present , but nutrients were low. According to the professor, based on info that was discovered in fossil, amount of Co2 was high so this induced nutrients to be scarce. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article posits that warm climate played such an important role in this due to many animals saved their energy which kept them warm was contributed to growth. The professor refutes this point by explaining that many small animals are observed where warm climates dominates. Moreover, large animals need colder climate to release their heat through body, that is why it can not be conducive in order this process.
In summary, while both the reading and the professor provide interesting information with regard to anatomy of past animals, significant amount of evidence support that the professor presented more legitimate grounds. Therefore, the article fails to justify the claim towards stand points of the lecturer.
- Some people like to do only what they like already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risk. Which one do you prefer? 80
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire : an experienced worker at a higher salary or inexperienced worker at a lower salary? 100
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," as it became kno 80
- Why do you think some people are attract to dangerous sport or activities? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Nonetheless, the professor explain that none of the evidence verified the factor...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...deed a vast number of plant were present , but nutrients were low. According to th...
^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more legitimate grounds. Therefore, the article fails to justify the claim towar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, while, as for, in summary, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21238938053 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65537745184 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2654726668 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267044166225 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814402787472 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773490680963 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137324196078 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087226500539 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.