In view of the reading, the author enumerates 3 advantageous of using electronic databases instead of paper-based records in the United States by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents a piece of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that it can provide the situation which spend less money since the electronic database needs any storage space. Besides, there are no costs of copying, faxing or transporting paper records when the system will become the electronic format. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the electronic databases also need to keep information as an emergency back up which needs to pay money for it.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the paper-based format of keeping information increase the possibility of the error like writing error or indecent transcription which causes serious result for the patients. Also, the author believes that such these errors, never ever occured in electronic format. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that due to using the pen for write these records, it has low impossibility to occur the problem for missing the data. Furtheremore, when someone wants to enter the paper-based data in electronic format, it could increase the chance of entering fallacious data.
Finally, the author asserts the easy use of information by searching through the electronic format as the last point for supporting the advantageous of using electronic format owing to the impossibility of search beyond a plethora of information in paper-based. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by saying that there are some rule related to privacy of the patient in US and if the electronic format be in common, the doctors could not be in touch with any information which they want and the patient can block the accessibility to use of their information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87254650746 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3054845345 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.363636364 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0909090909 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341874395286 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127715196377 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745006107796 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200165925389 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490792018621 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.