tpo 47
The reading and the lecture both discuss Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capable of powered flight or whether they were able only to glide.
The reading states that there are several arguments have been made against powered flight.
On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying that the Pterosaurs were cabable of powred flight.
First of all, the reading claims that since modern reptiles are cold-blooded, ancient reptiles such as pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded as well so pterosaurs would not have been able to generate the energy needed to fly. However, the lecture argues that Pterosaurs have a warm blood because Pterosaurs skin covering by a hiar which makes it is blood has high- tempreture.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that some Pterosaurs have probably so heavy that they would not have been able to flap their wings fast enough to stay aloft for any length of time.
The lecture argues this point by stating that Pterosaurs have a holo bones which make them weight low nough to stay aloft for any length of time.
Lastly, the reading argues that all animals with powered flight are able to take off from the ground. The lecture counter this claim by pointing out that Pterosaurs use four legs to jump because they walk on the land by using four legs, not like birds which walk using on the land using tow legs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs were probably cold-blooded as well so pterosaurs would not have been able to g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, so, well, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90756302521 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29228541356 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542016806723 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9504528328 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.777777778 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549521000706 0.272083759551 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241040396254 0.0996497079465 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118879746048 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262658339693 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110104535574 0.0443174109184 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.