TPO 47
The reading states that large Pterosaurs may have not been able to flight and presents trhee reasons. However, the professor refutes each of those points.
First, the article claims Pterosaurs, like current reptiles, are cold-blooded and such an animal have not enough energy to flight. However, the professor declines this point and supposes may Pterosaurs had been warm-blooded.
Second, the reading posits that Pterosaurs have been large and thus they could not to flight. The professor denies this claim by saying that Pterosaurs have had hallow bones and therefore in spite of their large body, they have been enaough light to flight.
Third, the article compares Pterosaurs with birds who have two legs for walking on the ground and claims that Pterosaurs have not been able to take off like birds. However, the professor refutes the point by considering that Pterosaurs have had four legs and are defferent of birds, thus they have been capable to take off.
- TPO 45 73
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 50
- TPO 47 60
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 46 : Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 1373.03311258 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 158.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20253164557 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4035304909 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 145.348785872 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 419.366225166 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3365034921 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380913965376 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188450537095 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856269802846 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249991578917 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472269816547 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 63.6247240618 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.