TPO 48
The lecture is about how the solutions made to solve the problem of declining frog populations are not practical.
First, reducing pesticides use by farmers is not fair or practical for the economy. Farmers rely on using pesticide to stay competitive or to decrease crop loss. If farmers follow strict regulations regarding the use of pesticides, they will suffer from severe disturbance compared to farmers in other areas. This, however, contradicts the information mentioned in the reading.
Second, applying the new treatment to overcome the fungus problem is very difficult and expensive as it must be applied individually. Applying it on a large scale of frog populations would be impossible due to the fact it would be hard to catch them. Moreover, this treatment won't prevent the passing of fungus to off spreading, so it would require applying to several generations in-order to be effective.
Third, excessive water use or the draining of wetlands is not the biggest problem that threatens frog populations. Global warming is a much bigger problem that threatening many other species not only frog. It contributed in the disappearance and extinction of many water and wetlands entire species. Thus, prevent humans’ activities is unlikely to decrease the threats facing frog populations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... frog populations are not practical. First, reducing pesticides use by farmer...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation mentioned in the reading. Second, applying the new treatment to ov...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enerations in-order to be effective. Third, excessive water use or the draini...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 261, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... in the disappearance and extinction of many water and wetlands entire species. Thus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46829268293 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00685712464 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619512195122 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1878894827 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4166666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408967361754 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131156990058 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808452331471 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208624541699 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789897130859 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.