TPO 48
Based on the article the decline in population of frogs is going to be a problem for human. For example, they protect human by eating disease=carrying insects. It provide three method that can prevent frog extension. The lecturer states that all the three methods are not practical and rejects all of them.
First, the reading states that pesticides is harmful for frogs. Pesticides is a chemical that farmers use to protect crops from insects. According to reading if farmers do not use it, it helps to protect frogs, In contrast, the professor states that it is impossible for farmers to not use that because the crops will be destroyed by insects.
Second, the text claims that Fungus are the other cause of frog decline because they stick to frog's skin and prevent frogs to absorb water with their skin. On the other hand, the professor mentions that it is impossible to get each frog individually and clean it, also it is expensive to do.
Third, Based on the article one of the reason of frog decline is their habitats are threated. These animals need water for laying on their eggs, lack of wet lead them to extinct. If people save their habitat the frog will recover. On the contrary, the professor expresses that water reduction is because of global warming and people cannot prevent frog’s habitat because they need water too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
... by eating disease=carrying insects. It provide three method that can prevent frog exte...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
.... Pesticides is a chemical that farmers use to protect crops from insects. Accordin...
^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'frog'.
Suggestion: frog
...e of frog decline because they stick to frogs skin and prevent frogs to absorb water ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eggs, lack of wet lead them to extinct. If people save their habitat the frog will...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, third, for example, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46133496794 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497835497835 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.021733996 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3076923077 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4944994504 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175586445996 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984699655395 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277066923287 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664607341058 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.