The passage states that there is a decline in number of frogs worldwide, nowadays and provides three possible solutions to prevent the decline. However, the lecturer refutes them and supports her reasons by explain each of the point.
First, the reading passage asserts that frogs are being harmed by pesticides that farmers apply to their field. Therefore, by prohibiting the farmers from using the chemicals, the problem will be solved. Conversely, the professor explains that the solution is not economically practical and fair to the farmers because they need to be competitive in the market and they rely on pesticides. If they do not use pesticides, they lose crops and yields will be damaged. Therefore, this solution includes sever disadvantages for farmer.
Second, the author states that fungus cause infection in frogs. Treating the infections in large scale will save the frogs population. While, the speaker discusses that since the treatment needs to be done individually, it will be extremely difficult to be done in large scale. Also, for every new generation the treatment process should be repeated again and again which makes it more complicated and expensive.
Third, the passage explains that natural habitats of frogs are threatened by human activity such as excessive water use. Therefore, the water habitats should be protected from water use. However, the professor explains that although it is a good idea, however, the main threatening of the water habitats is global warming. Protecting water habitat from water use of human will unlikely solve the problem.
- TPO 37 3
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- TOEFL TPO 46 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- TOEFL TPO 46 - Integrated Writing Task 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasons by explain each of the point. First, the reading passage asserts that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ludes sever disadvantages for farmer. Second, the author states that fungus ca...
^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...infections in large scale will save the frogs population. While, the speaker discusse...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
...eration the treatment process should be repeated again and again which makes it more complicat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es it more complicated and expensive. Third, the passage explains that natural...
^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... human will unlikely solve the problem.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31349206349 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69846813669 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9534266641 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2666666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347498505117 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121247045778 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088644754472 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186407644997 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775556802822 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.