The passage is mainly about the extinction of frog from different activities and writer has explained some solutions for its protection in mainly three ways but speakers found many things inaccurate when compared with what happens in real.
First,in the reading passage it is mentioned that frogs are being affected because of using pesticides by the farmers in their crops.Pesticides harm on nervous system and their whole body.But speakers contradicted the point by saying that it is not the good solution because pesticides is necessary for crops to kill insects and to protect crops because farmers cannot yield in the comptative market without increase in crops.
Second,writer as stated that fungus is also affecting frogs thickening their skin and they suffer from dehydration and he suggest to use antifungus to protect them.But it is impossible to use antifungus chemical for individual frog because it is the expensive method and it is not transform to next generation if it is done with one each individual it is another part where we can experience contradicted theory.
Third,as per the writer due to excess using of water in wetland where frogs lay their eggs by human many frogs are affected so he focus to control excess water by human but speakers argue that it is not the exact things but frogs species are mainly affected by global warming so water and wetland animals are being extincted which is directly contradicted to the passage
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ed with what happens in real. First,in the reading passage it is mentioned tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pesticides
...esticides by the farmers in their crops.Pesticides harm on nervous system and their whole ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... on nervous system and their whole body.But speakers contradicted the point by sayi...
^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , writer
...t without increase in crops. Second,writer as stated that fungus is also affecting...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...and they suffer from dehydration and he suggest to use antifungus to protect them.But i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ggest to use antifungus to protect them.But it is impossible to use antifungus chem...
^^^
Line 10, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...perience contradicted theory. Third,as per the writer due to excess using of w...
^^^
Line 10, column 131, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'focuses', 'focusses'.
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
... by human many frogs are affected so he focus to control excess water by human but sp...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is directly contradicted to the passage
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72832047951 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 21.2450331126 282% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8050641894 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 308.75 110.228320801 280% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.0 21.698381199 277% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403744462048 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230408772569 0.0996497079465 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066865697394 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230408772569 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066865697394 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.8 13.3589403974 246% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 10.58 53.8541721854 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.7 11.0289183223 242% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 10.7273730684 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.498013245 248% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.2008830022 259% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.