The reading passage states importance of frogs in the ecosystem, also, the three ways to prevent decrease in number of frogs. However, the lecture points out the limitations of these proposed methods.
First, the reading article advise to have strict laws regarding pesticides use by farmers near the endangered frog population. Pesticide can seriously harm frogs. The lecture refutes this claim by stating, strict laws controlling pesticide use will not be economically practical and fair for the farmers. Farmers in that particular area will be at severe disadvantage than their competition. There is higher chance of losing crops and getting lower yields.
Secondly, the reading introduces use of anti-fungal cream to prevent the skin thickening; caused by a fungus, resulting into dehydration. However, the lecture argues that, treating individual frogs is very complicated and expensive procedure. Also, the infection can be passed on to the next generation; making it difficult to work on large scale.
Lastly, the passage recommends protecting natural environment of frogs from human activities. Wet lands, water systems are threatened by excessive use and development. The lecture counters this claim by pointing out, global warming is a bigger threat than human activities. It is the main reason behind extinction of various species. Moreover, the professor adds, prohibiting human activities near frogs' habitat will unlikely prevent the ongoing changes in the habitat caused by global warming.
In conclusion, the lecture refuses the theories discussed in the reading article to prevent the decreasing frog population.
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 95
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 71
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 78
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ry complicated and expensive procedure. Also the infection can be passed on to the n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
..., prohibiting human activities near the frogs habitat will unlikely prevent the ongoi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67611336032 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87378106003 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3742392235 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.625 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4375 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33013932955 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952504746769 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067136957171 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164162138211 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512443429675 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.