TPO 50
The reading claims that in order to send humans to Mars, scientists must solve some problems that they haven't been confronted when they conquer the moon. The lecturer, on the other hand, finds all the ideas mentioned by the reading dubious and presents some rebuttals to refute them all.
The author argues that the trip to Mars and back will take at least two years and because of the limited capacity of the spaceship, astronauts cannot take enough food, water, and oxygen with them. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that they can easily use hydroponics techniques, which concerns about growing plants in water instead of soil, to provide food and recycle wastewater. In addition, growing plants absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, and astronauts have fresh air to breathe too.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that zero-gravity of space create some health problems for astronauts in the long-term, like decreasing muscle mass and lowering bone density. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that astronauts have learned several techniques to surmount the repercussions of zero-gravity. She goes on stating that astronauts can exercise regularly to strengthen their muscle mass and use vitamins and minerals to overcome with the lower bone density.
Finally, the reading asserts that astronauts would be exposed to dangerous levels of space radiation, most of which comes from the sun, and constructing a shield to protect them would be impossible since too much weight would be added to the spaceship. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that they aren't exposed to deadly levels of radiation all the time since the sun is sometimes particularly active and emit dangerous radiations. In fact, she argues, astronauts can use an instrument to detect when the levels of radiation are deadly, and they could use a light shelter to shield the spaceship in the times of dangerous active radiation and protect themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Iman karim | 57 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | porteghale Abiasli | view | |
| 2022-09-01 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | TommyTan | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 70
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 66
- Agree or Disagree? movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- TPO 50 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ists must solve some problems that they havent been confronted when they conquer the m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts some rebuttals to refute them all. The author argues that the trip to Mars and...
^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...es this issue due to the fact that they arent exposed to deadly levels of radiation a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, so, then, at least, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22429906542 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67140450227 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0666799595 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.454545455 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.