tpo 51
The material discusses the concept of asteroids colonization, While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the reading details specific pointsregarding this topic, namely asteroids low gravilty makes landing and taking off are easy. Next, colonization on asteroids is beneficail because of the avilability of valuable metals there. Finally, it is very easy to reach asteroids, since they are close to earth.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is asteroids' low gravity has risks, because it reduces muscles mass and bone denisety. Consequently, the low gravity could have health problems that could affect long term colonization. In addition to that, the avilability of precious metals has additional factor, the cost to support colonization could be very high; which reduces its benefits. As a result, the cost of selling the metal may not be beneficial. One final point, it is easy to reach asteriods, but it is not easy to return given that asteroids are moveable, so they may not stay close to the earth, they could move far from it. Therefore, moving further away could make a trouble, because asteroids may go that far that would be a challenge.
- the burning mirror 80
- do you agree or disagree? if people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying? 86
- tpo 256 3
- do you agree or disagree? it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs? 78
- tpo 54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... go that far that would be a challenge.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9115209417 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2307944514 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.