tpo 6
The text and lecturer offer two opposing views one the disadvantages of Communal online encyclopedias. While the reading passage lists some factors such as the lack of academic credit, the alternation of data by hackers, and the wide variety of its resources beyond the academic information as the negative sides of the online encyclopedias, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes the facts of rare academic adherence which in the passage is named as one of the main disadvantages. The lecturer states that it is an arduous task to find an accurate resource without the errors. Besides, these mistakes are common in the traditional encyclopedias too; however, since their printed form they do not change or edit for decades. On the other hand, the online form can update faster than the traditional form.
Next, the passage mentions to unscrupulous users who threaten encyclopedias’ validity. Inasmuch as, they can easily alter their data without others' awareness. The lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he asserts there is an especial format for the information which depicts the validity of data. In addition, there are expert editors who observe the information of this source and whenever they face inaccurate information they edit it.
Finally, the professor argues that the points of broad, depth information about the various issues as the negative part of the online encyclopedias. Meanwhile, the passage presumes that they do not merely cover the educational or intellectual data, and they focus on the trivial and invaluable information. Based on the lecturer's perspective, the traditional sources have the limited volume to cover whole information. In the sake of this restriction, the basic concentration was about the scientific information. However, online sources do not have this drawback and they can address different issues for various interest. As a result, this can be considered as the advantage of this kind of sources.
The professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. 70
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis 50
- Tpo231 80
- tpo49-integ 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...nd invaluable information. Based on the lecturers perspective, the traditional sources ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246031746032 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.113756613757 0.158904122519 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103174603175 0.0723426182421 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0435111971325 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0343915343915 0.0277247811725 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134920634921 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.015873015873 0.0370669169778 43% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.9662115141 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.010582010582 0.0208969081088 51% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.161375661376 0.128158765124 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.010582010582 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132275132275 0.0114777025283 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2159.0 1645.83664459 131% => OK
No of words: 341.0 271.125827815 126% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33137829912 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384164222874 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307917888563 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231671554252 0.187439937562 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134897360704 0.113142543107 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9662115141 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542521994135 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 58.483793027 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9444444444 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3447230924 49.3711431718 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.944444444 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 49.7362333007 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.14285714286 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120847170465 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0948811365538 0.0787303798458 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591519532156 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183268408242 0.139662658121 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.489041461728 0.414875509568 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0608661901485 0.0530846634433 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.