tpo24
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of reveal materials in the T.rex's leg bone. While the reading part lists some clues as possible explanations for these substances to be remain of soft tissue, the professor counters these specific points and presents some evidence to call into the questions for the information in the text.
First of all, the article mentions to the small branching channels and inside the bone which contains a soft, flexible organic substance as the indicator of blood vessels' remains. However, the instructor refutes this fact. As he asserts, after the death, the bacteria colonized in the hollow, and these soft tissues are the relic of these bacteria in the hollow. That is how the lecturer casts doubt on the accuracy of the claim.
Next, the passage posits to the existence of spheres which could be the remains of red blood cells. On the contrary, the lecturer states that primitive animals do not possess the red blood cell. Besides, other animals excavated in this side possess this dark red center. As a result, these red centers can be caused be the reddish mineral rather than the iron.
Finally, meanwhile, the reading part assumes that the dinosaur leg bone contains collagen; the professor rebuts the validity of this surmise. Based on his assertion, the collagen is resistance just for 1000 thousand years; however, this bone is aged about seventy million years, which is a long span for the collagen to survive. In addition, the professor assumes that the collagen belongs to the other recent sources. For instance, it could be the collagen of researcher's skin who hold the bone by hand.
All in all, that is how the instructor challenges the validity these claims named in the article.
- Your school is going to improve the teaching quality of the teachers of their high school students(ages 14-18), which of the following methods do you think is better:1. To choose a group of excellent teachers; the teachers will attend an additional traini 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- tpo 29.1 60
- tpo11.1 86
- tpo44-integ 85
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287009063444 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.12084592145 0.158904122519 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0664652567976 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.02416918429 0.0435111971325 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00906344410876 0.0277247811725 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123867069486 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.02416918429 0.0370669169778 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44578091775 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0181268882175 0.0208969081088 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.187311178248 0.128158765124 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00906344410876 0.0158828679856 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0211480362538 0.0114777025283 184% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1763.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97627118644 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362711864407 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301694915254 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210169491525 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0881355932203 0.113142543107 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44578091775 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545762711864 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.2024736422 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7200154679 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 132.220823453 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.878197800319 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 49.8361581921 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.82352941176 1.90840788429 148% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.714585431423 0.549887131256 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12001052944 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0522029371533 0.0787303798458 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.67282805261 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160487194574 0.139662658121 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.364262453426 0.266732575781 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1375784377 0.103435571967 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.470709968533 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0943613189558 0.0530846634433 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.509455172812 0.40443939384 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104597468028 0.0528353158467 198% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.26048565121 235% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.