tpo45
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the bee nests fossil. While the reading part lists some skeptics to doubt the validity of this resemblance, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the article posits that the lack of actual bees' fossils indicates that this fossil was not bee nest. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As she states, although there are no fossils of actual bees, it does not mean there was any bee in the two million years ago. The bee can be properly fossilized in the resin, substance released by the tree. Maybe in that period there was no tree to provide that content; as a result, the bees did not be fossilized as expected.
Next, the text mentions to the mutual link among the flowering plants and bees, and the absence of flowering plants at that time as the evidence, which the bee could not be existed at that point too. On the other hand, the lecturer challenges this assumption. As she asserts, it is feasible that with the absence of the flowering plants, the bees depended on the other unflowering plants such as the fern and the pain tree, and by the appearance of the flowering plants the bees altered their diets and provided this mutual relationship.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage assumes that the variations in some details of nest structure are a clue that the nest did not belong to the bees; the professor refutes this surmise too. Based on her assertion, even though there are some differences among the modern bees' nest structure and this nest's pattern, the chemical analysis demonstrates both of them possess the same chemical. Both of the fossilized nest and modern nest shaped with a waterproof material which is identical; thus, both of them are constructed by the bee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
- tpo4 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for colleagues or classmates to communicate in person than through emails in order to do a project 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today 80
- tpo24.1 70
- TPO31 86
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247222222222 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.136111111111 0.158904122519 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0583333333333 0.0723426182421 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0472222222222 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222222222222 0.0277247811725 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.128828473217 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0305555555556 0.0370669169778 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4766535926 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0138888888889 0.0208969081088 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.188888888889 0.128158765124 147% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00555555555556 0.0158828679856 35% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00555555555556 0.0114777025283 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1890.0 1645.83664459 115% => OK
No of words: 325.0 271.125827815 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81538461538 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.304615384615 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243076923077 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178461538462 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0984615384615 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4766535926 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504615384615 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.7483617043 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5971207335 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.384615385 132.220823453 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 49.3076923077 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532553701156 0.549887131256 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155882555302 0.142949733639 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.075952320903 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6707456577 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153972133231 0.139662658121 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.280596206332 0.266732575781 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975451356585 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.460910241115 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0683091926617 0.0530846634433 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409944148203 0.40443939384 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033041067159 0.0528353158467 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.