TPO48 Integrated Writing

Essay topics:

TPO48 Integrated Writing

In the reading passage, the author lists out three solutions for the declining population of frogs. However, the speaker does not think these ideas can successfully work out since the following reasons she mentions.
To begin with, the author points out that the government should build laws to prohibit the farmers using harmful pesticides which can attack frog's nervous system and lead to severe breathing problems to them. Nevertheless, the speaker argues that the strict laws about the usage of pesticides would bring economically negative impacts on farmers. For example, it might become hard for farmers to compete in the markets since their production of crops will decrease.
Secondly, according the reading passage, the fungus which causes thickening of frog's skin would lead to the deadly effect on frogs. Therefore, the author raises that the treatments which can kill fungus with heat should be applied in a large scale. However, the speaker rebuts it by doubting the effectiveness of the treatment since the disease would occur independently on each frogs and can be passed from their offsprings. As a result, the speaker believes it is difficult and expensive to apply these treatments.
Lastly, even though the author indicated that the human activities strongly threaten the water habitats such as lakes and wetland, the speaker asserts that the main problem of the reduction of water habitats is global warming. Since the global temperatures gradually increased, wetlands and lakes became fewer and smaller. Therefore, the speaker does not agree that reducing the human activities in these habitats can prevent the declining of frog's population.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-18 JesseSang 85 view
2020-08-09 MinaSh 70 view
2020-06-06 s12345 view
2020-05-13 s12345 70 view
2019-07-25 stasi 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35877862595 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6345058694 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56106870229 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0522162185 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33849714106 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11186492555 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076830339815 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183870606932 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719212286014 0.0443174109184 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.