The wooly mammoth was a prehistoric animal that resembled an elephant and lived during the Ica Age.
The reading and the lecture are both about the factors which could have been responsible for extinction of wooly mammoth. According to the reading passage there were two main reasons which could have let to the dramatic decline in the population of mammoth, those reasons are global warming and overhunting. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. By using the following evidence she posits that neither climate change nor overhunting would have led to the rapid decline in population of wooly mammoth.
To begin with, there is no definite evidence that the warming of climate actually affected the mammoth. The lecturer agrees that the cool environment is more friendly to the mammoth. She contends that the mammoth could just move to the north. This point differs from the author’s according to which the change in climate could have been responsible for the extinction of mammoth.
Furthermore, the professor posits that the mammoth did not have any natural predators. She weakens the author’s point by drawing a parallel between a modern lion and an ancient tiger, which was not large enough to hunt mammoth. This counters the point according to which a saber-toothed tiger could break through thick skin of a mammoth killing it.
By the same token, ancient people could not have been responsible for the extinction of the mammoth just because the mammoth was a suitable animal for humans’ needs. She contends that ancestors could use the bones, skin and meet from other preys which are more easy to hunt on such as buffalos or bears. This point differs from one in the article, according to which humans are also responsible for overhunting the mammoth.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
- Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world Recently there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today s world Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed First defenders of zoos say 80
- Altruism is a type of behaviour in which 80
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, if, so, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5269869935 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478571428571 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1576893462 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136024695772 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553628095762 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367285067838 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941704983088 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102339495415 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.