Some people enjoy taking risks and trying new things Others are not adventurous they are cautious and prefer to avoid danger Which behavior do you think is better Explain why

Human behavior differs from one individuals to the next. Behaviors are achieved and learned during an individuals lifetime. Some might be firece other might be modest, some might be plucky, other might be craven. Many people would love to be cautious and be free from dangers. However, I always love to be fearless and adventurous. It is my firm belief that being adventurous and fearless is more important and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

First, human are curious creatures by nature. They love to experiment new things and experience new world. This curious character has grown into me as well. taking a personal example, when I was at the age of 10, I took part in a debate competition for the very first time. I had never known debate before. I didn't have experience in public speaking either. I took part in that competition out of curiosity and eagerness. But, this curiosity in me helped me to shape into better personality and boosted my confidence. It was that adventurous inside me that helped me gain that confidence. So, it is better to be adventurous and risk taking than cautious for ones personal growth.

Secondly, it is important for every individuals to step out of their comport zone for gaining progress. There are many events in life that humans miss because of staying in their comfort zone and not buying up their risk. Taking risk is a means of stepping out of comfort zone. There was one event during my life that helped me gain higher reward because I worth the risk. When I was in my childhood we used to bet money in different football matches. It was a match between mighty Manchester United and lowkey MK Dons. Every of my friend placed bet in favour of United but I, out of my foolishness, tried betting for MK Dons. Surprisingly, lowkey MK Dons won the game and won about twenty times the money that I bet. Had, I not taken the risk and settled for the banal bet, I wouldnot have won such generous prize. So, taking risk is worth.

In shadows of above lights, I strongly believe that being risk bearing and trying new things is more important. It is so because, risk bearing person tries new things and develops new ideas. Risk bearing characters are subjected to higher prize pool as well. Thus there are myriad reasons to be convinced that risk bearing is more important that being cautious and danger avoiding

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one individual', 'an individual', or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: one individual; an individual; individuals
Human behavior differs from one individuals to the next Behaviors are achieved and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...iors are achieved and learned during an individuals lifetime Some might be firece other mig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ways love to be fearless and adventurous It is my firm belief that being adventur...
^^
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs First human are curious creatures by nat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... time I had never known debate before I didnt have experience in public speaking eith...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...urous and risk taking than cautious for ones personal growth Secondly it is impo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g than cautious for ones personal growth Secondly it is important for every indiv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h generous prize So taking risk is worth In shadows of above lights I strongly be...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4518730147 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464114832536 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 418.0 20.1344086022 2076% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1919.0 100.406767564 1911% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 418.0 20.6045352989 2029% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 57.0 5.45110844103 1046% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198600584385 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198600584385 0.076458572812 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118340650443 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471901867955 0.0645574589148 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 209.2 11.7677419355 1778% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -344.33 58.1214874552 -592% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 165.1 10.1575268817 1625% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 27.16 8.01818996416 339% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.002688172 560% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 169.2 10.0537634409 1683% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.247311828 546% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.