The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Although contested by many that learning various languages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a prominent number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being bilingual can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a linguistic standpoint, learning an official language can provide the society with some profound effects which stem from the fact that globalization, as well as different civilizations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more job opportunities. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both cognitive skills and the vernacular distinctly can be seen.

Within the realm of conversational science, speaking a dead language might increase the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, disturbing aspects of knowing a dominant language and the ability to speak a lingua franca relate to this reality that the demerits of native language pertain to the power of expression. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that efficient experiences is correlated negatively with mingling with people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of broadening our horizons.

To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the privileges of language learning outweigh its flaws substantially. Not only does native language prove the significance of widely using around the world, but it also pinpoints career implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Although contested by many tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to outweigh'
Suggestion: to outweigh
...hat the privileges of language learning outweigh its flaws substantially. Not only does ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76447876448 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33767649355 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1099184187 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202631595898 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630766927408 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549205265704 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111112967608 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669070867113 0.0609392437508 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.