Nowadays, forming a group of students with similar academic abilities, which attracted the numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. According to me, it can be said that grouping learners according to their performance is beneficial, while on the other hand stands a perspective that it can demotivate the pupil with average abilities. This essay will elaborate both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why making a group of students according to their academic performance is good but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that learner with the same educational performance can generate more productive ideas by working with same level of groupmates. For example, if one student in a group have low level of performance and facing problems to grasp the concept then it can raise difficulties for other group members. Thereby, grouping students according to academic abilities is playing a crucial role in increasing the performance.
Nevertheless, some people hold an opposing view and tend to believe that forming the group of pupils according to academic abilities will not only demotivate the other students with low IQ, but also impact on their learning abilities. Because, students can learn from other students more easily. Therefore, isolating the students in academic studies accoring to their performance level can lead to some serious consicuances.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some concerns, the role of grouping pupils according to academic abilities in acheiving outstanding performance is instrumental indeed.
- Creativity is born with or can be taught or improved. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of advertisements 85
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to another political figure science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 85
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...nd drawn the attention from the public. According to me, it can be said that grouping learners ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lso impact on their learning abilities. Because, students can learn from other students...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44573643411 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93774159884 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2766194325 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.5 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295093644154 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13210019383 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076049840383 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19133850345 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518646646764 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.