Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree

Recently, the phenomenon of air travel and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that only richest people can get the advantages of air travel developments, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that ordinary people cannot benefit from air travel, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree that people in lower financial level could not benefit from the advantages of advanced airways. At first, air travel helps people to save time and travel in a short time. However, only richest people could benefit from first-class airplanes. For example, ordinary people cannot purchase the ticket of advanced airlines due to their expensive services.
In addition, by air travel, people can avoid boring journey with bus and train. But ordinary people just can travel with safe airways due to their expensive tickets. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of people in the lower financial situation can only cheap airlines such as economy class, which use airplane with old technologies.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of an expensive air trip far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for the financial situation but also for their safety.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of air travel a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lines due to their expensive services. In addition, by air travel, people can a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch use airplane with old technologies. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36324786325 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83923146263 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3803428116 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455697848682 0.242375264174 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172424284304 0.0925447433944 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933635960306 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269043169733 0.151781067708 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127861120551 0.0609392437508 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.