cashless society
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless market is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic card can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a bank card can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of financial transactions, as well as secured credit facility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered real financial benefits. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online money and financial conditions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, an electronic card might increase the consequences of payment services. Moreover, fundamental aspects of shopping online could relate to this reality that the demerits of online transactions pertain to hacking the bank details. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of hidden charges is correlated negatively with the client’s bank account. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of faster and safer money services.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of electronic banking prove the significance of payment methods, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-07 | jagadeeshjimmy | 72 | view |
- extreme sports 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- 7.Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and em‐ ployment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 11
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62548262548 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21982721732 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637065637066 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5712240218 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124555559385 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430905468837 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943060020603 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722098028003 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975041000148 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.