Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts.
Recently, the phenomenon of rapidly progress of mass communication and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of mass communication is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. In this essay we will discuss the advantageous and disadvantageous of rapid progress of mass communication.
To begin with, the advantageous of mass media would be include, speed, accessibility and being more convenient. Mass communication can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that boosting in speed as well as accessibility, are inextricably bound up. For instance, instead of face-to-face communication with friend we can tweet them wherever or whenever we preferred. Thus, the beneficial consequences of boost in speed and tweeting apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, mass communication has some noticeable drawbacks such as invasion of privacy and separating people emotionally. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of invasion of privacy related to this reality that with the aim of mass communication, email hacking would be easier. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of mass media is correlated negatively with cybercrimes. Hence, it is correct to presume mass media is a renowned way to misuse private information.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on pros and cons, I profoundly believe that the benefits of information revolution and mass media far overweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of accessibility prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint cybercrime implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Deepika Naresh Rohra | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Ebrahim | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | Snoob | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | ddk0014 | 55 | view |
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol some people think that the best way to reduce the crime rate is to ban alcohol Do you think this is an effective measure against crime What other solution can you suggest 80
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- Many people think that regions affect the successful person. What is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to? 88
- You have just spend a week with a friend on holyday, when you got home you realize you have left your wallet thereWrite a letter to your friend in your letter:Thank your friend for the holidayExplain that you left your wallet in their houseGive them instr 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sting in speed as well as accessibility, are inextricably bound up. For instance,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6962962963 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44746979841 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2661848317 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733223374717 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264613258252 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0212621718143 0.071462118173 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462457604684 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206850002027 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.