Consumers should avoid over package products.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on the society due to over package and garbage. While it is possible to claim that overpackage products are high quality and customers should buy, my point of view that the packing with different plastic items should stop. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of view related to this topic.
First and foremost, product wrapping adds different plastic items into the environment, and this is one of the main courses for air, water and soil pollution. For example, In Sri Lanka, most of the overwrapping products are rejected by customers in supermarkets, and they use reusable papers for wrapping. This leads to a sustainable wrapping style in Sri Lanka. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the overwrapping should avoid by the customers as well as merchants.
In the other hand, those who believe that the overwrapping protects the products says plastic and other paper wraps increase the quality of the product. For example, those people should check the brand name and the wrapping papers when they select goods as well as services. Therefore, it is considered that the customers and consumers should select the products according to the wrapping papers. But, anyone can not use the waist of the wrapping and this leads to the environmental pollution.
In conclusion, it is believed that the overwrapping products should avoid by the consumers at least into a certain extent. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that the governments and professionals should enforce the rules and regulation to streamline over wrapping processes and inform the disadvantages for consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | Aruna Matta | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | karan Kunal | 77 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | view | |
| 2019-12-26 | richierich25 | 88 | view |
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 11
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 72
- Consumers should avoid over package products. 55
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 85
- As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21352313167 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84586277203 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501779359431 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9583014495 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180961858386 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691389603059 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731766032823 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118777596965 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688449880647 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.