Do teachers punish students for late submission of assignments in universities?
With the advancement of technology, there is a number of changes seen in the field of education, now, most of the universities started assignments based scoring for improvement of skills. Universities set a fixed date for submission of assignments. In case pupils failed to submit their tasks on time, teachers deduct their marks. Now it is a debatable issue that whether a university has to deduct marks or not. I strongly accord that universities should penalize students for late submission of their work. I am going to share my viewpoints in upcoming paragraphs.
Starting with, fixing a deadline for submission of any task will bring more responsibility and punctuality among the students and this motivates them to complete the all-important task of their life within time. Furthermore, if universities do not strictly bring these rules than aspirants will be careless and they cannot succeed in their life as casual approach cannot bring success in life,
Moving further, teachers must guide the aspirants for timely completion of their respective job and may ask regularly before the due date. Furthermore, they may help the weak students where they are lacking for completion of tasks. Last but not the least, universities may extend the time if anyone has a solid reason for no submission on time only after proper satisfaction of their respective faculty.
In recapitulation, although universities should legally penalize students for late submission of their files yet such rules should not be strict and proper guidance with faculty support should be provided to aspirants for completion of their work on timely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... may ask regularly before the due date. Furthermore, they may help the weak students where ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27307692308 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99084154313 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.614927468 50.4703680194 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330819160388 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131772188281 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089491782544 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199178486384 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074431738808 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.