Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that?
Nowadays, playing exciting and dangerous activities have become popular among the young people all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the dangerous activities should be supported or not?”. It is a widely held view that doing dangerous sports is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that adventure sports play a vital role in each society. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that it gives you a sense of self-confidence to overcome the challenges and fears or to reduce depression. Secondly, it can be argued that dangerous sports are in the category of lucrative sports so the industries of sports equipment will be able to grow their sports productions and boost up the revenue. In addition to this information, very tangible sportspersons, working at prestigious gyms conducted that such sports are so exciting that contribute to release adrenalin and the young people will be able to try new occasion.
However, there is no doubt that the risky and dangerous sports provide people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that permanent and serious damages happen as a result of adventure activities. Moreover, it is quite clear that the expenditure of training and purchasing sports equipment is high in price. A very tangible example to illustrate would be the disability of young people who have been occurred by skiing or skydiving.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that playing dangerous sports under professional trainers must be supported. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- "The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. 79
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 11
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 80
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- Is television a form of entertainment or information? Discuss your views. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97224942874 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1455005791 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10633975073 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365340074655 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040078264815 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656457194105 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477085790332 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.