Drawbacks of over packaging. Give your opinions?
The importance of over packaging which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This will explain my reason negative effects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that over packaging is increased by produces because they want more money by over packaging as well as consumers can handle over packaging furthermore over packaging can effect on consumers business they get loss by over packaging products. Another pivotal aspect for this argument is that by over packaging consumers loss their money. Needless to say all these merits stand over packaging in a good stead.
Elaborating, my view point this trend has some demerits but one of the crucial effect is that over packaging by producers can decrease business level of consumers moreover over packaging products can waste by producers As well as producers packed cheap things and sale to consumers. Besides, over packaging of cheap things can getting loss consumers respect in people sight. Hence it is apparent why many are against over packaging.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion the drawbacks of over packaging should not be overlooked either
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small shop. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 80
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any diseases? Pros and cons? 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...loss consumers respect in people sight. Hence it is apparent why many are against ove...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, look, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25339366516 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68162831182 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.6687100678 50.4703680194 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15508593865 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821162054421 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502057232762 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101219162856 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406222628286 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.