In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in the levels of environmental pollution due to unsustainable exploitation of nature for human benefit. While some argue that individuals can make a difference, others believe that only the government can effectively counter this problem. This essay will discuss both the sides and provide reasons why only the government can alleviate environmental concerns.
To begin with, one strong argument in favour of individuals driving the change is that ultimately, it is up to them to embrace lifestyle changes that lower the factors responsible for environment pollution. For example, abolishing the use of plastics for paper or cloth-based packaging material can eliminate a major source of soil pollution. Furthermore, preferring public transport over individual cars can lessen air pollution. Therefore, individual contributions can help reduce pollution to an extent.
However, only at the government level can real change on a global scale be brought. Not only are they the most competent authority, but also have adequate financial and material resources at their disposal to implement stringent laws for tackling this issue head-on. For instance, proper regulations can limit the quantity of industrial effluents discarded into rivers and harmful gases released by industries. Moreover, they can make it mandatory for citizens to abide by environment-friendly policies to curtail the extent of pollution.
To conclude, despite the contribution of each individual to manage environment pollution, a significant reduction can occur only with the intervention of the government. In my opinion, nature-friendly citizens coupled with a strong government resolve can most certainly mitigate the factors causing environmental pollution.
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 77
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 11
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model Do you support it or not 89
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80228136882 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29789992834 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6463878327 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1180748328 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205931657434 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809528577791 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761918932496 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121647986444 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377117331683 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.