Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge in a trend to see that professionals give undue importance to their work life more than the quality time spending with their loved ones, be it in an affluent or impoverished nation. Prodigies argue that in the cutthroat competitive era, one has to put their career at the top in their list of priorities to be at the preponderant position. However, it leads to the perennial problems which are elaborated in this essay with a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of detrimental effects which can be associated with this modern approach. The most conspicuous one is that improper work-life balance will generate unnecessary stress in the family. Not only this concept has been followed by citizens of developed countries but also it has become the part and partial of the daily lives of the people in developing and underdeveloped nations across the globe.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that working for extra hours in greed to earn more money will have deleterious effects on the one’s health in the form of chronic diseases; stress being at the top. Moreover, prioritizing only the professional life will lead to the shortage of time for leisure time activities like sports and giving relaxation to the body and soul. In addition to, sparing less time for family members and friends would loosen the strong bond among the dear and near ones leading to low emotional support.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned discussion, it can be concluded that the trend of giving more importance to the money making in compare to living the personal life with the full heart has been spreading like a spider web and it carries the unfortunate downsides, which are too great to ignore.
- People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life. What do you think about? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 77
- Technological access to online music and the like should be paid or free. What do you think? 77
- The government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree? 80
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01355932203 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81491900983 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2508091232 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.9 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180655285315 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642209474874 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521201867796 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977702660261 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464790298777 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.