The 21st century is also referred to as an era of massive innovation and technological revolution. These revolutions have touched all aspects of human lives, including the way we do and perceive information as a mass communication. There have been massive inventions in the area of mass communications. Proponents are debating over this phenomena, many believe, it has profound impacts on the society and has left profound impacts on the civilization, however, others have opposite views stating that such advancements have led to detrimental influence in people's life. In this article, I will discuss both positive and negative side of this development before deriving a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, mass communications have changed the way people perceive new, information and advertisements. First, the medium of mass communication is not limited to newspapers nowadays, it has scattered across television, internet, and smart devices. It has paramount benefits to offer, like, people can perceive news, important information, educational contents, and entertainment at their convenient time and place. The contents are more vivid so it can comprehend easily and effectively. For instance, the majority of student prefer to refer the internet for getting updates about new products, its features, and development.
On the other hand, this faster medium of communications come with negligible downsides and, hence, have certain detrimental impacts on mankind. For example, it has become extremely difficult to decide the authenticity of content, such rumors some time led to chaos like situations and turns out to be riots. For example, recent false news about killing innocent children of minority communities sparked massive riots and taken the lives of many people.
In conclusion, in my view and as per above example, it is evident that the information revolution in mass communications can be boon for humans if used effectively, otherwise, it can be turned in to the ban.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nications. Proponents are debating over this phenomena, many believe, it has profoun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48859934853 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20039494003 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631921824104 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.474173844 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144343713525 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493003028479 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586278659718 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825631660349 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021617622523 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.