Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping malls has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question" Is this sufficient to replace small shops with large shopping malls?". Whereas it is a widely held view that shopping malls are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the x standpoint, large shopping centers are bound up inextricably with being accessible under a single roof, which indicates they lead to both time saving and accessibility. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between online shopping and customer relationship management as well as an exponential increase in the customer's satisfaction. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to large parking bays and promoted facilities alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the tendency to shop from malls is correlated positively with not only accessible high-quality items but also easy to access goods.
Within the realm of trading, without the slightest doubt, small stores attribute to being eaten up by large chain stores, in that it would come down to financial power and competitive market. A salient example of such attribution is a long time in line, which is a cause for concern since mistaken to take energy-consuming markets for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint chain store problems. Hardly had they confined their attention to time efficiency and even energy efficiency. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of small retailing shops.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" All's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that supermarkets are highly beneficial.
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree 77
- "More information available online so library'sbook are useless" or As e-books are available onlinethese days, the value of printed books has diminished.Agree or disagree. 78
- These days more emphasis is being placed on university education. Vocational training is not encouraged, and thus there are few qualified trades people. To which extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
... well as an exponential increase in the customers satisfaction. Researchers, nevertheless...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5910652921 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18611004539 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9148330498 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.583333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244243282425 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750393618718 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862815754262 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134054375413 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121771198577 0.0609392437508 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.