In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.

Recently, the phenomenon of written examination in the educational system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of examination methods is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that, continual assessment on a yearly basis can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the educational standpoint, the written examination can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being self-disciplined as well as getting an equal opportunity, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic experiment which discovered examination caused students become competitive and increase their efforts. Thus the beneficial consequences of both self-disciplined equality can be observed.

Within the realm of assessments, writing examination might exacerbate the consequences of learning. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of writing examination related to this reality that the demerit of feeling disappointed pertains to the pressure of examination. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the written exams correlated negatively with a sense of anxiety and stress of students. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of written assessment.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of continual assessment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of this kind of assessment prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint written assessments implications.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...competitive and increase their efforts. Thus the beneficial consequences of both sel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ense of anxiety and stress of students. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81481481481 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42584384286 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4557734721 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111223180361 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372138927636 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326086564772 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641505691108 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203063621139 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.