Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of people spends too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that hard working through people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the hard-working individuals at outdoor can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university faculty member, I performed an academic investigation which discovered this phenomenon can improve living incomes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, influence on the personal life might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with pivotal issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of har working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65134099617 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18903322552 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5464736929 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256721306103 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850735899859 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187653331068 0.071462118173 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138618854215 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182179746788 0.0609392437508 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.