Recently, the phenomenon of the fact that parents have better to promote their offspring to obtain part-time professions in early stages of their lives and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the the kids' independency is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that supporting children to have a part-time job in their childhood can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, supporting kids to act as an adolescent by obtaining a part-time occupation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the demerits of independent children, as well as the preparation for the future adult life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered the significance of being independent in life. Thus, beneficial ramification of both competency and the self-assured kids apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, living independently via having a part-time vocation might increase the consequences of juvenile delinquencies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of anti social behavior could relate to this reality that the demerits of social critical matters pertain to kids unprecedented adaptability. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of adulthood expectancy is correlated negatively with having a separate professional work. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of apprenticeship for kids in early ages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of inspiring children to seek for part-time careers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of dependent lifestyle prove the significance of improvement, but also pinpoint a vast array of significant implications.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 80
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss 80
- Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree. 88
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 88
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofessions in early stages of their lives and its corresponding impacts has sparke...
^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...gh contested by many that the matter of the the kids independency is highly beneficial,...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...gh contested by many that the matter of the the kids independency is highly beneficial,...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...sted by many that the matter of the the kids independency is highly beneficial, such...
^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...p. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1207.87684729 148% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59561128527 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3531331514 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0022504675 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209438356695 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657699288535 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694456368821 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11561117166 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541934460089 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.