Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the public transport systems tend to run down as people are getting more dependent on the motor cars. Whereas some people say that public transport system is not affected by the usage of the private cars, I sanguinely believe that It does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that people prefer to travel using their personal car for traveling, which increases the traffic on the road and effects the public transport. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted research which revealed that as the public transport takes more time to travel in peak hours, most people prefer to use their personal cars. Thus, the beneficial ramification of using a personal car apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that public transport system is not affected by the private cars, as the public transport system is still useful for the communities who live farther from the town centers and need a cheaper option for traveling. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research proves that public transport slowness effects human decision to travel using the motor cars.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using car far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of car usage prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implication of using public transport.
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind, such as reading and doing word puzzles.Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time.•You should write at least 250 words.•Y 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 70
- Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago? 77
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10211267606 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63507115277 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1513747911 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256719250447 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090278330896 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679422586861 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147609441239 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061891461225 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.