Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether personal development is the base for professional development.
Furthermore, this has elicited a stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas some people say that personal development does not impact professional development, I sanguinely believe that it does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that personal development enhances the self-confidence. Therefore, it helps the individual in their professional development. Recently, new research conducted shows that individuals who invested in their personal development had performed better than the person who didn't invest in their personal development.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that personal development is not alone enough for professional development. Therefore, Individual should get the professional training to grow professionally.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of doing personal development prove its significance, but also pinpoint implications of not investing in personal development.
- PTE essay:It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? 77
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 77
- Talk about the pros cons of this era as is full of daily inventions 56
- In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific examples and examples to support your answer. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ad performed better than the person who didnt invest in their personal development. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t invest in their personal development. On the contrary, skeptics conjecture tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98522167488 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34072965886 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600985221675 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8046884568 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.454545455 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198259063865 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757261006075 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647394077961 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115243886106 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041162515257 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.