Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of schools should prepare students for work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that preparing students for universities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, students prepared by schools can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, prepared students might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of school students could relate to this reality that the demerits of students' achievements pertain to working in a company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preparing students for universities not for work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon pertain to total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-12 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 80
- Do you think card-less society is realistic and why? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75836431227 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20835289234 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5164575615 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235963221191 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795175205449 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553768263377 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139423144914 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178208371048 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.