Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue. What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect.
Recently, the phenomenon of rising in the world temperature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. The consequences such as sea level rising, extreme floods, and water pollution are strongly related to this problem. So, I am inclined to believe that investigating the reasons for this issue and finding comprehensive solutions can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From an environmental standpoint, studying the causes of global warming can provide the Earth with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the demerits of greenhouse gases, as well as air pollution, are inextricably bound up. According to the latest NASA research, burning fossil fuels, relentless cutting forests trees, and toxic gases produced by cars and factories are the main reasons for this serious problem.
Within the realm of science, coming up with ideal solutions might reduce the hazardous results of global warming. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of increasing global temperature could relate to this reality that the demerits of the volume of dangerous gases such as CO2 pertain to the lack of strict rules from the government to monitor produced fumes from industries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA University has asserted that reducing the amount of non-recyclable garbage plays a vital role to solve this issue. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of investment in generating green products.
To conclude, a rise in the Earth's temperature is so harmful to all creatures. Consequently, I profoundly believe that figuring out the causes of this predicament, Not only do the disadvantages of air pollution prove the significance of the amount of CO2 emission but also pinpoint the importance of supporting industries to reduce toxic gases and invent sustainable products.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3843537415 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03609679558 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8416556579 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.909090909 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194092928947 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591047209483 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454504278794 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101284592333 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00774678490928 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.