Nowadays, Public Transport is one of the important parts of our life. There will be a very good impact on the country and society if public transport made free. This is because many people will be encouraged going to use them. However, I would like to show, in this essay, why there are more advantages to making public transport services free and why there will be a few disadvantages.
In the beginning, making public transport like metros, buses or taxis free of charge means attracting many people to ride these types of transport. This will result in people abandoning their transports like private cars or motors. The advantage beyond that is the city environment would be improved due to the reduction of the extracted carbon from the car exhausts.
On the contrary, there might be few disadvantages too due hindering of public transport to be free of charge. Except for the rich countries, not every country is able to make that. This is because the government will solely bear the charge of public transport maintenance, which is often very expensive. In addition, the government will solely pay the salaries of the associated working staff. These extra charges, some governments may not be able to pay for.
In conclusion, I would prefer that governments should make balancing above both points of view. From one side, it should minimize the charge of using public transports to the minimum, so everyone can ride it. Then from the other side, the governments should give fare maintenance services to the public transport to ensure the safety of them and fare salaries to their associated staff to ensure better service to gain more customers.
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge while other disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge while other disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 55
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge while other disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- The co evolutionary relationship between cows and grass is one of nature s underappreciated wonders it also happens to be the key to understanding just about everything about modern meat For the grasses which have evolved to withstand the grazing of rumin
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, except for, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95683453237 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66528072433 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525179856115 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.332020977 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8666666667 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299626971638 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100977571521 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571593132961 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181580661601 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193699950729 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.