Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion
Ancient times has an antiquity, some believe that history articulate people to apprehend the present while others maintain that there is very less to communicate about history. To a larger extent, I also opine that the past history gives us a better understanding of our present. I will explain both the views in further paragraphs.
The most prominent supporting reason is that studying the past history elucidates the evolution of the mankind like how we reach here where we are at present. Furthermore, it enlightens about the technologies followed in ancient times which is undoubtedly helping us to improve further in contemporary times. Also, history provides us with a guide to improve further and inspirations from the great men in history. Thereby it proves the fact that studying the past assist us in a great understanding of present so ameliorate our future.
On contrary, there is another stratum of society who believes that past was quite different and we cannot apply that knowledge in our present. For example, earlier people are more superstitious who indulged in many immoral acts. Needless to say, these types of instances are not needed in present. Another, opponents of studying the history said that there were no professionals in history like architects and accountants but I believe they forgot about the architects.
In a nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that though there is no space for superstitions, history reveals more positive outcomes and its consequences so in my opinion studying the history helps our enhanced understanding of the present.
- ‘Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.’ How far do you agree with the statements? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experience or observations 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it? 67
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 62
- ‘Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.’ How far do you agree with the statements? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experience or observations 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27734375 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97082318647 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57421875 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1200814717 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.583333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351358989756 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118670225046 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837953847879 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214068085677 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606332503962 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.