Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of music is as important as other subjects in school and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the music subject is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that musical instruments can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, musical learning activities can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of musical abilities, as well as music celebrities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered cognitive skills and artistic viewpoint. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both contemporary music and classical music apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning musical techniques might increase the consequences of a work-life balance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of ignoring such issues pertain to the learning disorder. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of music downloading is correlated negatively with a rigid and undesirable society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of children tendencies.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of empowering music as an important subject in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the school curriculum prove the significance of highlighting this issue, but also pinpoint learning in children life implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the pros and cons. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6914893617 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28344476222 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0676538447 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256948067631 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856460153598 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580003447768 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148885953481 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039923736741 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.